Warren v. Federal Government

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. 2 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 11/26/13. (CLA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
REV. CALVIN WARREN,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:13-CV-2379 JCH

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Over the past four months, plaintiff has filed more than twenty delusional and
frivolous cases in this Court regarding a religiously-motivated conspiracy against his
family.1 Plaintiff repeatedly alleges that the government is using racism, terrorism,
and Satanism against him and is trying to rape and murder his family because they are
Christians and preachers of the gospel.
The Court previously warned plaintiff that it would not allow him to proceed
in forma pauperis if he continued to bring the same frivolous lawsuits again and
1

See, e.g., Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1465-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1560-RWS (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal
Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1570-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13CV-1634-HEA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1643-AGF
(E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1780-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal
Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1906-TIA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13CV-1998-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2069-SPM
(E.D. Mo. 2013).

again. Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo.). This case is no
different from his previous cases. Consequently, the Court will deny plaintiff’s
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss this action without
prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid complaint. See In re Tyler, 839 F.2d 1290, 1292
(8th Cir. 1988) (“Judicial resources are limited in the short run and need to be
protected from wasteful consumption. Frivolous, bad faith claims consume a
significant amount of judicial resources, diverting the time and energy of the judiciary
away from processing good faith claims.”).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without
prejudice.
A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously.
Dated this 26th day of November, 2013.

/s/Jean C. Hamilton
JEAN C. HAMILTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-