Warren v. Federal Government

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/02/2013. (CBL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION REV. CALVIN WARREN, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:13-CV-2408 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Over the past four months, plaintiff has filed more than twenty delusional and frivolous cases in this Court regarding a religiously-motivated conspiracy against his family.1 Plaintiff repeatedly alleges that the government, along with other entities or groups, is using racism, terrorism, and Satanism against him and is trying to rape and murder his family because they are Christians and preachers of the gospel. The Court previously warned plaintiff that it would not allow him to proceed in forma pauperis if he continued to bring the same frivolous lawsuits again and 1 See, e.g., Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1465-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1560-RWS (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1570-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13CV-1634-HEA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1643-AGF (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1780-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1906-TIA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13CV-1998-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2069-SPM (E.D. Mo. 2013). again. Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo.). This case is no different from his previous cases. Consequently, the Court will deny plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid complaint. See In re Tyler, 839 F.2d 1290, 1292 (8th Cir. 1988) (“Judicial resources are limited in the short run and need to be protected from wasteful consumption. Frivolous, bad faith claims consume a significant amount of judicial resources, diverting the time and energy of the judiciary away from processing good faith claims.”). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. Dated this 2nd day of December, 2013. CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?