Ramic v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein, and the decision of the Commissioner in this case is AFFIRMED.A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 2/2/15. (JWJ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RASIDA RAMIC, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:13CV2442 AGF-TIA MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman, to whom this matter was referred for recommended disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On January 13, 2015, Magistrate Judge Adelman filed his Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to do so has passed. Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the Commissioner’s decision in this matter should be affirmed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein, and the decision of the Commissioner in this case is AFFIRMED. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. _______________________________ AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 2nd day of February, 2015. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?