Turner v. Cassady

Filing 107

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter comes before the Court after this Court held a hearing on March 22, 2016 in regards to all of Petitioner's pending motions. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Specific Orders [ECF No. 69] is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Preliminary Objection to Review of the Magistrate Recommendation, Seeking a Stay Pending Review and Hearing, Assignment of Counsel [ECF No. 76] is DENIED with righ t to refile. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's pro se Motion for Judgment [ECF No. 79] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Supplemental Suggestions for Sanctions [ECF No. 80] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petit ioner's Petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum and Setting for conference [ECF No. 83] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for a Partial Summary Judgment Supported by Affidavit and S upported Uncontroverted Statement of Facts [ECF No. 87] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Pro Se Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions [ECF No. 92] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Judgment ordered by the Court to Respond to his Own Motion for Judgment [ECF No. 99] is DENIED. So Ordered this 29th Day of March, 2016.Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on March 29, 2016. (MCB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
BILLY RAY TURNER, JR,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
v.
JAY CASSADY,
Respondent.

Case No. 4:13-CV-02470 ERW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court after this Court held a hearing on March 22, 2016 in
regards to all of Petitioner’s pending motions.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Specific Orders [ECF No. 69]
is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Preliminary Objection to Review of the
Magistrate Recommendation, Seeking a Stay Pending Review and Hearing, Assignment of
Counsel [ECF No. 76] is DENIED with right to refile.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s pro se Motion for Judgment [ECF No.
79] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Supplemental Suggestions for Sanctions
[ECF No. 80] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad
testificandum and Setting for conference [ECF No. 83] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for a Partial Summary Judgment
Supported by Affidavit and Supported Uncontroverted Statement of Facts [ECF No. 87] is
DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Pro Se Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions
[ECF No. 92] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Judgment ordered by the
Court to Respond to his Own Motion for Judgment [ECF No. 99] is DENIED.

So Ordered this 29th Day of March, 2016.

E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE