Warren v. Federal Government

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is DENIED. A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 1/3/14. (KJS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
REV. CALVIN WARREN,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:13-CV-2630-CEJ

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Over the past four months, plaintiff has filed numerous delusional and
frivolous cases in this Court regarding a religiously-motivated conspiracy.1 He

1

See e.g., Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1465-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1560-RWS (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1570-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t,
No. 4:13-CV-1634-HEA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV1643-AGF (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1780-CEJ (E.D.
Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1906-TIA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1998-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t,
No. 4:13-CV-2069-SPM (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV2093-DDN (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2147-JAR (E.D.
Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2206-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2233-CAS (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t,
No. 4:13-CV-2303-NAB (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2306-CEJ
(E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2339-JAR (E.D. Mo.); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t; 4:13-CV-2340-TIA (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV2379-JCH (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2408-CDP (E.D. Mo.);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2444-TCM (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t,

alleges that the federal government and other named defendants are “ungodly” and
are “using racism and terrorism” against him and are trying to murder him and his
family.
The Court previously warned plaintiff that it would not allow him to proceed
in forma pauperis if he continued to bring the same frivolous lawsuits again and
again. Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo.). This case is no
different from his previous cases. Consequently, the Court will deny plaintiff’s
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss this action without
prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid complaint. See In re Tyler, 839 F.2d 1290, 1292
(8th Cir. 1988) (“Judicial resources are limited in the short run and need to be
protected from wasteful consumption. Frivolous, bad faith claims consume a
significant amount of judicial resources, diverting the time and energy of the judiciary
away from processing good faith claims.”).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis [Doc. # 2] is DENIED.

4:13-CV-2539-CEJ (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2560-AGF (E.D.
Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2564-HEA.
-2-

A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously.
Dated this 3rd day of January, 2014.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-3-