Warren v. Federal Government

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. [Doc. 2] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 1/15/2014. (NCL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

REV. CALVIN WARREN,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:14-CV-59 CAS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Over the past five months, plaintiff has filed numerous delusional and frivolous cases in this
Court regarding an alleged religiously motivated conspiracy.1

He alleges that the federal

government and other named defendants are “ungodly” and are “using racism and terrorism” against
him and are trying to murder him and his family.

1

See, e.g., Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1465 CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1560 RWS (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV1570 JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1634 HEA (E.D. Mo. 2013);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1643 AGF (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No.
4:13-CV-1780 CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1878 CEJ (E.D. Mo.
2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1906 TIA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t,
No. 4:13-CV-1998 SNLJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2069 SPM (E.D.
Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2093 DDN (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal
Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2147 JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2206 JAR
(E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2233 CAS (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2303 NAB (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2306
CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2339 JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t; 4:13-CV-2340 TIA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2379 JCH
(E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2408 CDP (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2444 TCM (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2539 CEJ
(E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2560 AGF (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2564 HEA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2630 CEJ
(E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2631 SNLJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, 4:14-CV-0023 JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:14-CV-0048 JAR
(E.D. Mo. 2013).

The Court previously warned plaintiff that it would not allow him to proceed in forma
pauperis if he continued to bring the same frivolous lawsuits again and again. Warren v. Federal
Gov’t, 4:13-CV-1878 CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013). This case is no different from his previous cases.
Consequently, the Court will deny plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and will
dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid complaint. See In re Tyler, 839 F.2d
1290, 1292 (8th Cir. 1988) (“Judicial resources are limited in the short run and need to be protected
from wasteful consumption. Frivolous, bad faith claims consume a significant amount of judicial
resources, diverting the time and energy of the judiciary away from processing good faith claims.”).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
is DENIED. [Doc. 2]
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice.
A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously.

CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 15th day of January, 2014.

-2-