Bussie v. Boehner et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. 2 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 1/17/14. (CLA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
JOHN BOEHNER, et al.,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis [Doc. #2].
Plaintiff, an inmate at the Philadelphia-FDC in
Pennsylvania has filed at least three previous cases that were dismissed as frivolous,
malicious, or for failure to state a claim.1 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), therefore, the
Court may not grant the motion unless plaintiff was “under imminent danger of
serious physical injury” at the time the complaint was filed. See Martin v. Shelton,
319 F.3d 1048, 1050 (8th Cir. 2003)(imminent danger of serious physical injury must
exist at the time the complaint is filed).
See Bussie v. Attorney General, Case No. 3:13-CV-476-WMC (W.D. Wis.);
Bussie v. Federal Election Comm’n, Case No. 3:13-CV-477-WMC (W.D. Wis.);
Bussie v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., Case No. 1:13-CV-23000-UU (S.D. Fla.);
Bussie v. United States, Case No. 3:11-CV-1475-FLW (D. N.J.); Bussie v. Brauman,
Case No. 3:13-CV-1055-AWT (D. Conn.).
After reviewing the complaint, the Court finds no allegations indicating that
plaintiff was in imminent danger of serious physical injury when he filed his
complaint.2 As a result, the Court will deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and will dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis [Doc. #2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without
prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.
Dated this 17th day of January, 2014.
/s/Jean C. Hamilton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
For relief, plaintiff seeks $865 billion dollars. To the extent that once can be
discerned, the theme of the complaint appears to be that the federal government is
corrupt and defendants, who are United States congressmen and presidents, as well
a federal district court, have “caused harm” to plaintiff through their jealousy, envy,
anger, and hatred. Plaintiff’s rambling, disjointed allegations are legally frivolous
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?