Warren v. Federal Government
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 03/06/2014. (CBL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
REV. CALVIN WARREN,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:14CV00242 SPM
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Over the past six months, plaintiff has filed numerous delusional and frivolous
cases in this Court regarding a religiously-motivated conspiracy.1 He alleges that the
1
See e.g., Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1465-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1560-RWS (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1570-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t,
No. 4:13-CV-1634-HEA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV1643-AGF (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1780-CEJ (E.D.
Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013);
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1906-TIA (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal
Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-1998-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No.
4:13-CV-2069-SPM (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2093DDN (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2147-JAR (E.D. Mo.
2013); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2206-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren
v. Federal Gov’t, No. 4:13-CV-2233-CAS (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, No.
4:13-CV-2303-NAB (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2306-CEJ (E.D.
Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2339-JAR (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal
Gov’t; 4:13-CV-2340-TIA (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2379-JCH
(E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2408-CDP (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal
Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2444-TCM (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2539-CEJ
federal government and other named defendants are “ungodly” and are “using racism
and terrorism” against him and are trying to murder him and his family. He seeks nine
hundred trillion dollars in monetary damages.
The Court previously warned plaintiff that it would not allow him to proceed in
forma pauperis if he continued to bring the same frivolous lawsuits again and again.
Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo.). This case is no different
from his previous cases. Consequently, the Court will deny plaintiff’s motion for leave
to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling
as a fully-paid complaint. See In re Tyler, 839 F.2d 1290, 1292 (8th Cir. 1988)
(“Judicial resources are limited in the short run and need to be protected from wasteful
consumption. Frivolous, bad faith claims consume a significant amount of judicial
resources, diverting the time and energy of the judiciary away from processing good
faith claims.”).
Accordingly,
(E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2560-AGF (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal
Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2564-HEA (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2630-CEJ
(E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:13-CV-2631-SNLJ (E.D. Mo.); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, 4:14-CV-0023-JAR (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:14-CV-0048JAR (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:14-CV-0059-CAS (E.D. Mo.); Warren v.
Federal Gov’t, 4:14-CV-0110-RWS (E.D. Mo.). Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:14-CV0180-NAB (E.D. Mo.); Warren v. Federal Gov’t, 4:14-CV-0299-JCH (E.D. Mo.).
-2-
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without
prejudice.
A separate Order of Dismissal will be filed contemporaneously.
So Ordered this 6th day of March, 2014.
E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?