Jones v. United States of America
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc.2] is GRANTED.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/3/14. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
RAFAEL A. JONES, SR.,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on petitioner’s submission of a petition for writ
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition will be summarily
Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District
Courts provides that a district court shall summarily dismiss a § 2254 petition if it
plainly appears that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.
In the instant petition, petitioner attempts to challenge three State of Missouri
convictions: State v. Jones, 07SL-CR03429-01 (21st Jud. Cir.); State v. Jones, 07SLCR06638 (21st Jud. Cir.); and State v. Jones, 0822-CR07366 (22nd Jud. Cir.).
Petitioner has previously brought challenges to each of these convictions in this
Court. See Jones v. Norman, 4:12-CV-617-AGF (E.D. Mo.); Jones v. Norman, 4:12-
CV-569-CDP (E.D. Mo.); Jones v. Prudden, 4:11-CV-1310-LMB (E.D. Mo.); Jones
v. Moriorty, 4:10-CV-495-LMB (E.D. Mo.).
The petition is duplicative and successive. As a result, petitioner may not
proceed without authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which he
does not have.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). The Court will therefore dismiss the
petition without further proceedings.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas
corpus is DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED.
Dated this 3rd day of March, 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?