Baker et al v. Steele et al
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement his Sur-Reply (Doc. 41) is GRANTED, in part. To the extent the Court construes Plaintiff's Motion as a Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply, Plaintiff may file a sur-reply on or before March 3, 2015. Plaintiff may, at that time, include the arguments and exhibit he has included in his current Motion.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/17/15. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
BARRY BAKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
TROY STEELE, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 4:14-CV-333-JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement Sur-Reply (Doc. 41).
In his motion, Plaintiff requests that Court allow him to supplement his sur-reply on the limited
issue of exhaustion. However, Plaintiff has not filed a sur-reply. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement his Sur-Reply (Doc.
41) is GRANTED, in part. To the extent the Court construes Plaintiff’s Motion as a Motion for
Leave to File Sur-Reply, Plaintiff may file a sur-reply on or before March 3, 2015. Plaintiff
may, at that time, include the arguments and exhibit he has included in his current Motion.
Dated this 17th day of February, 2015.
_________________________________
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?