Jackson v. United States of America

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that I will not issue a certificate of appealability. A separate Order of Dismissal will be issued forthwith. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/7/14. (KXS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION GUSTAVUS JACKSON, Movant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:14CV417 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Movant brings a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. I will dismiss it without further proceedings. Movant pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute more than 100 grams of crack cocaine. I sentenced him to 120 months’ imprisonment. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. Movant subsequently filed a motion to vacate under § 2255, which I denied on the merits. Now, movant has filed this successive § 2255 motion, alleging actual innocence. First, the instant motion is wholly conclusory and does not allege any facts, which if proved, would show that he is innocent. Second, because the motion is successive, movant cannot obtain relief in this Court without first obtaining permission from the Court of Appeals, which he does not have. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). As a result, I will dismiss this action without further proceedings. Finally, movant has failed to demonstrate that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition is successive. Thus, I will not issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. ' 2253(c). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that I will not issue a certificate of appealability. A separate Order of Dismissal will be issued forthwith. Dated this 7th day of March, 2014. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?