Christian v. McMahan Ford et al

Filing 62

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall change the docket sheet entry for the McMahon Automotive Group to reflect the name Schicker Automotive Group. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel shall respond to the Court no l ater than July 22, 2014 and state whether counsel will waive service of process on both John Schicker and the Schicker Automotive Group in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). Response to Court due by 7/22/2014. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/8/14. (CSG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION FRED CHRISTIAN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MCMAHON FORD, et al., Defendants. No. 4:14-cv-454 SNLJ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff=s Second Amended Complaint (#58), which was filed in response to this Court’s June 3, 2014 order (#46). The Second Amended Complaint adds as defendants John Schicker and the McMahon Automotive Group. Plaintiff later filed a Notice of Misnomer (#61), which stated that the McMahon Automotive Group’s true name is the Schicker Automotive Group. The Court observed in its June 3 order that the defendants’ counsel appeared to also represent John Schicker (see Doc. #36 at n.1). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall change the docket sheet entry for the McMahon Automotive Group to reflect the name Schicker Automotive Group. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel shall respond to the Court no later than July 22, 2014 and state whether counsel will waive service of process on both John Schicker and the Schicker Automotive Group in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). __________________________________ STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 8th day of July, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?