Warren v. Federal Government

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 04/10/2014. (CBL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
REV. CALVIN WARREN,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:14CV00663 ERW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Over the past eight months, plaintiff has filed numerous delusional and frivolous cases in
this Court regarding a religiously-motivated conspiracy against his family. 1 Plaintiff alleges that
the federal government and other named defendants are using terrorism, racism, and satanism
against him and are trying to murder him and his family because they are preachers of the gospel.
He seeks nine hundred trillion dollars in monetary damages.
The Court previously warned plaintiff that it would not allow him to proceed in forma
pauperis if he continued to bring the same frivolous lawsuits again and again. Warren v. Federal
Gov=t, 4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo.). This case is no different from his previous cases.
Consequently, the Court will deny plaintiff=s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
1

See e.g., Warren v. Federal Gov=t, No. 4:13-CV-1465-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov=t, No. 4:13-CV-1560-RWS (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov=t, No.
4:13-CV-1570-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov=t, No. 4:13-CV-1634-HEA (E.D.
Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov=t, No. 4:13-CV-1643-AGF (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v.
Federal Gov=t, No. 4:13-CV-1780-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov=t, No.
4:13-CV-1878-CEJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal Gov=t, No. 4:13-CV-1906-TIA (E.D. Mo.
2013); Warren v. Federal Gov=t, No. 4:13-CV-1998-SNLJ (E.D. Mo. 2013); Warren v. Federal
Gov=t, No. 4:13-CV-2069-SPM (E.D. Mo. 2013).
1

will dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully-paid complaint. See In re Tyler,
839 F.2d 1290, 1292 (8th Cir. 1988) (AJudicial resources are limited in the short run and need to be
protected from wasteful consumption. Frivolous, bad faith claims consume a significant amount
of judicial resources, diverting the time and energy of the judiciary away from processing good
faith claims.@).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff=s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
[ECF No. 2] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice.
So Ordered this 10th day of April, 2014.

E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2