Watson v. USAA Garrison Insurance Company et al

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this action is DENIED.[Doc. 16] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Leave for the Court to Observe and Correct the Lawsuit Anatomy in this Instance Case, which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration is DENIED. [Doc. 17]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 8/26/2014. (MRC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
WILLIE WATSON
Plaintiff,
v.
USAA GARRISON INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:14-CV-712 CAS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of this Court’s
dismissal of his pro se complaint on July 2, 2014, and plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave for
the Court to Observe and Correct the Lawsuit Anatomy in this Instance Case,” which the
Court also construes as a motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff’s complaint, alleging
various civil rights allegations, was dismissed as duplicative of a prior action filed by
plaintiff in this Court with identical claims. See Cooper v. Delo, 997 F.2d 376, 377 (8th
Cir. 1993) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) dismissal has res judicata effect on future in form
pauperis petitions).
Plaintiff has not set forth any meritorious grounds for review of the dismissal of
this action in either of his motions. As such, his motions for reconsideration will be
denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to for reconsideration of the
dismissal of this action is DENIED. [Doc. 16]

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Leave for the Court to
Observe and Correct the Lawsuit Anatomy in this Instance Case, which the Court
construes as a motion for reconsideration is DENIED. [Doc. 17]

CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 26th day of August, 2014.

-2-