Jones v. Clear Channel Broadcasting Company et al

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. [Doc. 2] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/1/2014. (NCL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RAFAEL A. JONES, SR., Plaintiff, v. CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING COMPANY, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:14-CV-1120 CAS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff=s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, a prisoner, has filed at least three previous cases that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim.1 Under 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g), therefore, the Court may not grant the motion unless plaintiff “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” After reviewing the complaint, the Court finds no allegations that would show that plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. As a result, the Court will deny the motion and will dismiss this action without prejudice to refiling as a fully paid complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. [Doc. 2] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 1 See Jones v. Brayer, Case No. 4:07-CV-1704 RWS (E.D. Mo.); Jones v. Brayer, Case No. 4:07CV-1723 ERW (E.D. Mo.); Jones v. Isom, Case No. 4:08-CV-1584 TIA (E.D. Mo.). An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order. CHARLES A. SHAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 1st day of July, 2014. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?