Iron Workers St. Louis District Council Annuity Trust et al v. Miller Building Group, LLC et al

Filing 14

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Post-Judgment Attorney's Fees 13 is GRANTED. Judgment for attorneys fees and costs in the amoun t of $575.00 is entered in favor of Pla intiffs and against Defendant.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall effect service of this Order and the Court's Orders of January 12, 2015 (Doc. No. 7 ) and March 27, 2015 (Doc. No. 12 ) on Defendant by whatever means they believe to be most effective, and shall promptly file a certificate of such service. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/30/15. (JWD)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

IRON WORKERS ST. LOUIS DISTRICT
COUNCIL ANNUITY TRUST, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
MILLER BUILDING GROUP, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:14-CV-1298-JAR

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND JUDGMENT
The Court is in receipt of counsel’s affidavit filed in support of Plaintiff’s motion for
post-judgment attorney’s fees. (Doc. No. 13) The Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an award
of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in bringing their motion for contempt in its Order of March
27, 2015. (Doc. No. 12)
Counsel states that attorneys in his firm expended a total of 2.1 hours related to the filing
of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Contempt and that his client is billed at an hourly rate of $250.00.
(Affidavit of Michael A. Evans, Doc. No. 13-1 at ¶¶ 2-3) The necessary services performed
include: “drafting and filing motion for contempt, arranging that court order setting hearing was
served upon defendant, and preparing for and attending contempt hearing.” (Id. at ¶ 4) In
connection with this matter, counsel states his firm expended a total of $575.00, including $50.00
in connection with the service of the Court’s Order upon Defendant.
Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Post-Judgment Attorney’s Fees
[13] is GRANTED. Judgment for attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $575.00 is entered
in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall effect service of this Order and the
Court’s Orders of January 12, 2015 (Doc. No. 7) and March 27, 2015 (Doc. No. 12) on
Defendant by whatever means they believe to be most effective, and shall promptly file a
certificate of such service.

Dated this 30th day of March, 2015.

_____________________________
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE