McNeal v. Slay et al

Filing 31

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant St. Louis Division of Corrections' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. [Doc. 19 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that plaintiff's claims against defendant St. Louis Division of Corrections are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 10/14/14. (KXS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

SHANNON RENEE MCNEAL,
Plaintiff,
v.
FRANCIS G. SLAY, THOMAS IRWIN,
BETTYE BATTLE-TURNER, RICHARD
H. GRAY, ERWIN SWITZER, D. SAMUEL
DOTSON, MARK GARAZINI, VINCENT
SIMPHER, ANDREW CREWS, SLMPD
DOE DEFENDANTS 1-99, ST. LOUIS
DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD
H. GRAY, DALE GLASS, CORRECTIONS
DOE DEFENDANTS 1-99, M. JANE
SCHWEITZER, CIRCUIT CLERK DOE
DEFENDANTS 1-99, and CITY OF
ST. LOUIS,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:14-CV-1353 CAS

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL
This matter is before the Court on defendant St. Louis Division of Corrections’ Motion to
Dismiss. In response, plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, conceding that the St. Louis
Division of Corrections is not a suable entity.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant St. Louis Division of Corrections’ Motion to
Dismiss is GRANTED. [Doc. 19]

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that plaintiff’s claims
against defendant St. Louis Division of Corrections are DISMISSED.

CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 14th day of October, 2014.

2