Proby v. Bullock et al
Filing
52
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before March 14, 2015, plaintiff shall provide the Court with the full name and address of defendant Christy Ramsey so that service may be effected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action as to Christy Ramsey, without prejudice andwithout further notice. Response to Court due by 3/14/2015. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/17/15. (CLA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
GEORGE PROBY, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
D.R. BULLOCK, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:14CV1355 HEA
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the Court is attorney Mark H. Zoole’s response to the Court’s Order of
January 21, 2015, stating that no one named “Christy Ramsey” is or was a former
employee of St. Francois County, Missouri, and that the last known address for this
defendant is unknown to him [Doc. #51].
Because plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '
1915, the Court is required to serve process on his behalf, provided that plaintiff has
given the Court the proper service information with respect to each defendant. As
such, plaintiff will be instructed to provide the Court with the full name and current
address of defendant Christy Ramsey on or before March 14, 2015, so that service
may be effected, as more fully set forth below.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before March 14, 2015, plaintiff
shall provide the Court with the full name and address of defendant Christy Ramsey
so that service may be effected.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this
Order, the Court will dismiss this action as to Christy Ramsey, without prejudice and
without further notice.
Dated this 17th day of February, 2015
___________________________________
HENRY EDWARD AUTREY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?