Bailey v. Golden State Foods Corp. et al

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion for Protective Order Quashing Plaintiffs Notice of Videotaped Deposition Duces Tecum of Corporate Representative from Golden State Foods Corporation and Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 37) no later than October 26, 2015, or the Court will rule on Defendants' unopposed motion. (Response to Court due by 10/26/2015.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 10/20/2015. (NEB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
)
)
)

HEATHER BAILEY,
Plaintiff,

)

v.

GOLDEN STATE FOODS CORP.
and DAVID LAX,
Defendants.

No. 4:14-CV-1631 RLW

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on its review of the record.

On October 9, 2015,

Defendants filed a Motion for Protective Order Quashing Plaintiffs Notice of Videotaped
Deposition Duces Tecum of Corporate Representative from Golden State Foods Corporation and
Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 37). To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to this
Motion. 1
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants' Motion

for Protective Order Quashing Plaintiffs Notice of Videotaped Deposition Duces Tecum of
Corporate Representative from Golden State Foods Corporation and Memorandum in Support
(ECF No. 37) no later than October 26, 2015, or the Court will rule on Defendants' unopposed
motion.

1

Pursuant to E.D.Mo. L.R. 4.01, a party opposing a motion must file a memorandum in
opposition within seven (7) days after being served with the motion.

Dated this 20th day of October, 2015.

RONNIE L. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-