Torrey v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 56

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all of plaintiff's pending motions are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall no longer accept filings in this case, with the only exception being if plaintiff files a timely and proper notice of appeal from this order, which must, of course, be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/15/15. (EAB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CLORIS BANKS TORREY, Plaintiff, vs. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:14 CV 1676 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On April 29, 2015, I granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff Cloris Banks Torrey’s complaint in its entirety, and this case was closed by the Clerk. Torrey did not appeal my order and judgment, and the time to do so has passed. However, in the past several months, she has filed more than ten motions, most of which seem to ask me to review or change my order dismissing her case. Some, like the most recently filed 41 page document, are copies of documents she has sent to others. Each of these motions is legally frivolous and none provide any basis for relief. Torrey is abusing the Court’s (and the taxpayers’) resources by filing frivolous documents in this closed case. Continuing to permit Torrey to file such motions is a waste of the court’s time and resources. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all of plaintiff’s pending motions are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall no longer accept filings in this case, with the only exception being if plaintiff files a timely and proper notice of appeal from this order, which must, of course, be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 15th day of September, 2015. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?