Torrey v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all of plaintiff's pending motions are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall no longer accept filings in this case, with the only exception being if plaintiff files a timely and proper notice of appeal from this order, which must, of course, be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/15/15. (EAB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
CLORIS BANKS TORREY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:14 CV 1676 CDP
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On April 29, 2015, I granted defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff Cloris
Banks Torrey’s complaint in its entirety, and this case was closed by the Clerk.
Torrey did not appeal my order and judgment, and the time to do so has passed.
However, in the past several months, she has filed more than ten motions, most of
which seem to ask me to review or change my order dismissing her case. Some,
like the most recently filed 41 page document, are copies of documents she has
sent to others. Each of these motions is legally frivolous and none provide any
basis for relief. Torrey is abusing the Court’s (and the taxpayers’) resources by
filing frivolous documents in this closed case. Continuing to permit Torrey to file
such motions is a waste of the court’s time and resources.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all of plaintiff’s pending motions are
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall no longer
accept filings in this case, with the only exception being if plaintiff files a timely
and proper notice of appeal from this order, which must, of course, be
accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
CATHERINE D. PERRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 15th day of September, 2015.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?