Starks o/b/o C.Y. v. Social Security Administration
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff's objections 24 are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on January 22, 2016 23 is adopted and sustained in its entirety. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/10/16. (ARL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
LANETTE STARKS o/b/o C.Y.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:14 CV 1809 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on appeal from an adverse ruling of the
Social Security Administration. The Court referred this matter to United States
Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni for a report and recommendation on all
dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On January 22, 2016, the
Magistrate Judge filed her recommendation that the Commissioner’s decision to
deny benefits be affirmed.
Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation. In the objections,
plaintiff merely restates the arguments raised before the Magistrate Judge –
namely, that the ALJ erred in not providing weight to counselor Shokooh Rafati’s
opinion. I have conducted a de novo review of all matters relevant to the
objections, and after careful consideration I will adopt and sustain the thorough
reasoning of the Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff objects that the ALJ gave no weight to Ms. Rafati’s opinion
concerning the domains of Acquiring and Using Information and Attending and
Completing Tasks. The objections will be overruled because Ms. Rafati is
considered an “other medical source” by the Social Security Regulations, 20
C.F.R. § 404.1527, and, as such, does not meet the qualifications of an
acceptable medical source under 40 C.F.R. § 416.913(a). Ms. Rafati’s opinions
are not entitled to controlling weight or the same level of deference as that of an
acceptable medical source. In determining what weight to give “other medical
evidence,” the ALJ has more discretion and is permitted to consider any
inconsistencies found within the record. Raney v. Barnhart, 396 F.3d 1007, 1010
(8th Cir. 2005). As Judge Crites-Leoni properly concluded, the ALJ provided
sufficient reasons for affording no weight to Ms. Rafati’s opinion, as it was not
supported by the treatment notes or objective testing and was inconsistent with
claimant’s school records and the medical opinions of Dr. Wotherspoon and Dr.
Allen. Moreover, when claimant was compliant with his medication there was a
“drastic improvement.” See Perkins v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 892, 901 (8th Cir. 2011)
(impairment not disabling if it can be controlled by medication).
For these reasons, I agree with Judge Crites-Leoni’s recommendation that
the ALJ’s RFC determination was supported by substantial evidence and the
2
decision to deny benefits should be affirmed.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff’s objections [24] are
overruled, and the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge
Abbie Crites-Leoni on January 22, 2016 [23] is adopted and sustained in its
entirety.
A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered
this same date.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 10th day of March, 2016.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?