Barnes v. Simmons et al

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint or respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) no later than Wednesday, April 8, 2015, or the Court will rule on Defendants' unopposed Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order and a copy of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) to Plaintiff Lloyd E. Barnes, 5418 Misty Crossing Court, Florissant, MO 63034. (Response to Court due by 4/8/2015.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 3/24/2015. (NEB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION LLOYD BARNES, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, V. LYNN SIMMONS, et al., Defendants. No. 4:14CV1989 RLW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on its review of the record. On February 25, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiffs motion to amend his complaint and ordered him to file an amended complaint no later March 11, 2015. complaint. pending. complaint. (ECF No. 24). To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended The Court also notes that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) is currently Plaintiff must either respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or file an amended If Plaintiff fails to do either of these, the Court will rule on Defendants' unopposed Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint or respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) no later than Wednesday, April 8, 2015, or the Court will rule on Defendants' unopposed Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order and a copy of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) to Plaintiff Lloyd E. Barnes, 5418 Misty Crossing Court, Florissant, MO 63034. Dated this 24th day of March, 2015 . RONNIE L. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?