Williams v. Kassebaum
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No.19) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on February 17, 2017. (MCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon plaintiff Troy Williams’s Motion for
Reconsideration of this Court’s January 18, 2017 order denying his motion to reopen his case.
(Docket No. 19). The motion will be denied.
This case began on December 11, 2014, when plaintiff, a resident at the Northwest
Missouri Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center, filed a complaint in this Court against Nancy
Kassebaum, a former senator for the State of Kansas. Therein, plaintiff alleged that he wrote to
Kassebaum about his idea to cure numerous diseases, and sent her a formula. On January 22,
2015, after determining that the complaint failed to state a claim for relief, this Court dismissed
plaintiff’s complaint. (Docket No. 5). On March 2, 2015, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal in the
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Docket No. 8). On May 26, 2015, the Court of Appeals
affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff’s case. (Docket No. 13). The Court of Appeals issued its
Mandate on July 7, 2015. (Docket No. 14).
On January 3, 2017, plaintiff moved to reopen his case, arguing that he did not receive
notice of dismissal until the year 2016 (even though he filed a notice of appeal in March of
2015), and also that Kassebaum has a listening device. Plaintiff also made statements related to
formulas, vaccines, and his own health. The Court denied the motion. Plaintiff has now filed a
motion seeking reconsideration of that order, but the motion is nothing upon which relief can be
granted, and will be denied.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No.
19) is DENIED.
Dated this 17th day of February, 2017.
E. RICHARD WEBBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?