Jackson v. Russell

Filing 31

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This matter comes before the Court on the Memorandum and Order of the United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce [ECF No. 30 ], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court notes no objections were filed to the Memorand um and Order within the time period afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has considered the Memorandum and Order, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate's Memorandum and Order in its entirety. The Ma gistrate's decision denying the writ of habeas corpus is affirmed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Petitioner Tommy L. Jackson Jr.'s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody [ECF No. 1 ] is DENIED, and DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 7/10/17. (EAB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TOMMY L. JACKSON, JR., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. TROY STEELE, Respondent. No. 4:14CV02116 ERW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the Memorandum and Order of the United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce [ECF No. 30], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court notes no objections were filed to the Memorandum and Order within the time period afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has considered the Memorandum and Order, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate’s Memorandum and Order in its entirety. The Magistrate’s decision denying the writ of habeas corpus is affirmed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Petitioner Tommy L. Jackson Jr.’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody [ECF No. 1] is DENIED, and DISMISSED. Dated this 10th Day of July, 2017. E. RICHARD WEBBER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?