Beedle v. Steele
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Jeremy Beedles Motion to Stay Proceedings [ECF No. 3 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner file, by June 22, 2015, either a notice to the Court indicating his intention to proceed with his habeas petition, or a Motion to voluntarily dismiss the petition. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 5/21/15. (EAB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JEREMY BEEDLE,
Petitioner,
vs.
TROY STEELE,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:14CV02126 ERW
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Nicole C. Collins [ECF No. 10], regarding Petitioner Jeremy Beedle’s “Motion to
Stay Proceedings” [ECF No. 3]. The Court notes no objections were filed to the Report and
Recommendation. After consideration of the issues and review of the record, the Court hereby
sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation.
In addition, the Court notes Petitioner may seek voluntary dismissal of his pending
habeas petition, if he wishes to pursue his new grounds in state court. Thus, Petitioner is ordered
to file, by June 22, 2015, either a notice to the Court indicating his intention to proceed with his
habeas petition, or a Motion to voluntarily dismiss said habeas petition.
Accordingly,
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Jeremy Beedle’s “Motion to Stay
Proceedings” [ECF No. 3] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner file, by June 22, 2015, either a notice to
the Court indicating his intention to proceed with his habeas petition, or a Motion to voluntarily
dismiss the petition.
So Ordered this 21st day of May, 2015.
E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?