Temptesta v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (ECF No. 24 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on October 5, 2015. (BRP)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JOSEPH TEMPESTA,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:15-CV-7 RLW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (ECF
No . 24). Therein, Plaintiff, with the consent for Defendant, requests that the Court amend the
Case Management Order because it "will likely be oppressive to the new parties," particularly
The Brickman Group who was added as a Third Party Defendant.
The Court, however, notes that there is no indication in the record that The Brickman
Group has been served. The Court believes that any Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order is
premature, given that The Brickman Group has not been served and has not joined in this Motion
that is supposedly on its behalf.

The parties should continue to follow the current Case

Management Order unless and until the Brickman Group is served and joins in a motion to
amend the scheduling order.
Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (ECF
No. 24) is DENIED.

Dated this 5th day of October, 2015.

)f~~
RONNIE L. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-