Ahrens v. CAMICO Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 124

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Following a teleconference with the parties counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, consistent with the direction of the Court during such teleconference, that the Condensed Motion of Noel Sevastianos to Quash Subpoena and for a Protec tive Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1) (Doc. 118 ) and the Motion of Nicholas Borusiewich to Quash Subpoena and for a Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1) (Doc. 119 ) are GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.Furthermore, the discovery issues raised by the parties position papers (Docs. 122 , 123 ) have been resolved by agreement of the parties. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/25/2016. (CLO)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
PATRICIA AHRENS, individually and as
TRUSEE OF PATRICIA AHRENS
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST dated
April 4, 2007,
Plaintiff,
v.
SWINBURNE & JACKSON LLP,
Defendant-Third Party
Plaintiff-Debtor,
v.
NICHOLAS WAYNE BORUSIEWICH and
BORSUIEWICH & COLE PC,
Third Party DefendantsDebtors,
CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.,
Garnishee.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:15-cv-00130-JAR

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Following a teleconference with the parties’ counsel,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, consistent with the direction of the Court during such
teleconference, that the Condensed Motion of Noel Sevastianos to Quash Subpoena and for a
Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1) (Doc. 118) and the Motion of Nicholas
Borusiewich to Quash Subpoena and for a Protective Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)
(Doc. 119) are GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part.
Furthermore, the discovery issues raised by the parties’ position papers (Docs. 122, 123)
have been resolved by agreement of the parties.

Dated this 25th day of August, 2016.

JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE