Speed v. Mummert et al

Filing 12

OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs FRCP Rule 52 Show Cause Motion [ECF No. 11] is DENIED. IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is prohibited from filing any future documents or motions in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall return to plaintiff anydocuments or motions bearing the above case caption, except for a notice of appeal or any appellate documents. 11 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/23/15. (CLA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
ANTONIO NATHANIEL SPEED,
Plaintiff,
v.
HONORABLE THOMAS C.
MUMMERT, III, and
HONORABLE RODNEY W. SIPPEL,
Defendants,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:15CV267 NAB

OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s “FRCP Rule 52 Show Cause
Motion.” The motion is frivolous.
Plaintiff has abused the judicial process of this Court and has wasted the
Court’s limited resources by filing repetitious and frivolous post-judgment
motions. To prevent further wasting of the Court’s resources, the Court will
prohibit plaintiff from filing any future documents or motions in this closed case,
except for a notice of appeal or any appellate documents.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “FRCP Rule 52 Show Cause
Motion” [ECF No. 11] is DENIED.

IT IS FUTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is prohibited from filing any
future documents or motions in this case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall return to plaintiff any
documents or motions bearing the above case caption, except for a notice of appeal
or any appellate documents.
Dated this 23rd day of April, 2015

___________________________________
HENRY EDWARD AUTREY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2