Humphrey v. United States of America
MEMORANDUM: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that Humphrey is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on the claims he asserts in the motion and supplemental motion to vacate. Therefore, the motions will be denied without a hearing. See Engelen v. United States, 68 F.3d 238, 240 (8th Cir. 1995). Additionally, the Court finds that Humphrey has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Therefore, no certificate of appealability will be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. An order consistent with this Memorandum will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 7/24/17. (JAB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.