Young v. Lawrence

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment [Doc. # 8 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for "Application for a Three- Judge Court Convene" [Doc. #9] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/10/15. (JWD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KEITH STANLEY YOUNG, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. SCOTT LAWRENCE, Respondent, No. 4:15CV362 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is petitioner’s motion to alter or amend judgment. The Court has reviewed petitioner’s assertions and found that his arguments cannot circumvent the fact that his application for writ of habeas corpus was successive and lacked certification from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. As noted in the Court’s prior order and order of dismissal, under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a) and § 2255(h) district courts may not entertain a second or successive application for writ of habeas corpus unless it has first been certified by the Court of Appeals. Because petitioner’s application for writ had not been certified by the Eighth Circuit, this Court could not grant his requested relief. As such, there are no grounds to alter judgment. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to alter or amend judgment [Doc. #8] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for “Application for a ThreeJudge Court Convene” [Doc. #9] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. Dated this 10th day of March, 2015. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?