Wilson et al v. PNK (River City), LLC.
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Plaintiffs Darren Metzger, Charles Patterson, Lawrence Wilson, Tedd Gan, and Sandra Gaither, pursuant to their previously filed Stipulations to Dismiss. (Doc. No. 66 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED without prejudice to the opt- in Plaintiffs Linhart, Remington, and Wyrsch to file their own individual lawsuits. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the statute of limitations will be STAYED for thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to permit opt-in Plaintiffs Linhart, Remington, and Wyrsch to file individual actions. Opt-in Plaintiffs Linhart, Remington, and Wyrsch are advised that the statute of limitations will begin to run again after this additional thirty-day period. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order to opt-in Plaintiffs Linhart, Remington, and Wyrsch at their addresses, as provided in Doc. No. 70 . (cc: Opt-In Plaintiffs) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 02/22/2017. (KCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
LAWRENCE M. WILSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PNK (RIVER CITY), LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:15CV00380 AGF
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the joint motion (Doc. No. 78) of the parties to
show cause to continue the suit of opt-in Plaintiffs Jo Linhart, Olivia Remington, and Ann
Marie Wyrsch.
In a January 12, 2017 Order (Doc. No. 76), the Court de-certified the collective
action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (“FLSA”), granted the
stipulations to dismiss for the three named Plaintiffs and two opt-in Plaintiffs, and ordered
opt-in Plaintiffs Linhart, Remington, and Wyrsch to show cause why the current Complaint
(Doc. No. 1) should not be dismissed without prejudice to their ability to initiate individual
lawsuits.
In their February 10, 2017 response, the remaining opt-in Plaintiffs requested that
the Court continue the case under the current Complaint and proceed to issue a case
management order. These Plaintiffs allege that they have been misclassified under the
FLSA, performed the same job duties as the settling Plaintiffs, but were offered
substantially less to settle the case.
This case, however, has been de-certified as an FLSA collective action, and will not
proceed jointly. As such, the case will not go forward under the current Complaint, which
was filed as a collective, and the Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice to the optin Plaintiffs filing their own lawsuits. To the extent that opt-in Plaintiffs Linhart,
Remington, and Wyrsch wish to pursue their claims, they must each file an individual
action. The Court will stay the statute of limitations for an additional thirty days to permit
the opt-in Plaintiffs to file individual lawsuits, should they so desire.
For these reasons,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as to
Plaintiffs Darren Metzger, Charles Patterson, Lawrence Wilson, Tedd Gan, and Sandra
Gaither, pursuant to their previously filed Stipulations to Dismiss. (Doc. No. 66.)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED without prejudice to
the opt-in Plaintiffs Linhart, Remington, and Wyrsch to file their own individual lawsuits.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the statute of limitations will be STAYED for
thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to permit opt-in Plaintiffs
Linhart, Remington, and Wyrsch to file individual actions. Opt-in Plaintiffs Linhart,
Remington, and Wyrsch are advised that the statute of limitations will begin to run again
after this additional thirty-day period.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this
-2-
Memorandum and Order to opt-in Plaintiffs Linhart, Remington, and Wyrsch at their
addresses, as provided in Doc. No. 70.
__________________________________
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 22nd day of February, 2017.
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?