Huson et al v. Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER / ORDER LIFTING STAY :IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Lift Stay 36 is GRANTED and the stay ordered on October 1, 2015 is LIFTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any supplemental response to De fendants Motion to Dismiss no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order; Defendant shall have ten (10) days thereafter to file any supplemental reply in support of its motion to dismiss. (36 in 4:15-cv-00418-JAR) Also docketed in 4:15-CV-453 JAR, 4:15-CV-488 JAR,, 4:15-CV-489 HEA, 4:15-CV-490 ERW, 4:15-CV-492 HEA, 4:15-CV-493 RWS. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/21/16. (KKS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
REBECCA MOORE,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:15-CV-418 JAR
Consolidated with Case Nos.:
4:15-CV-453 JAR
4:15-CV-488 JAR
4:15-CV-489 HEA
4:15-CV-490 ERW
4:15-CV-492 HEA
4:15-CV-493 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On October 1, 2015, the Court stayed this matter pending resolution by the Eighth Circuit
of the appeal in Nelson v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., No. 4:15CV00816 ERW, 2015 WL
5093437 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 28, 2015), a case involving the identical issue presented in this
consolidated action, i.e., whether filing a proof of claim for a time-barred debt is a violation of
the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq (FDCPA) (Doc. 30). The Eighth
Circuit Court of Appeals has since resolved that appeal. See Nelson v. Midland Credit Mgmt.,
828 F.3d 749 (8th Cir. 2016). The Court will, therefore, order the stay lifted. At the time the
Court stayed this matter, there was a pending motion to dismiss that was fully briefed (Doc. No.
18). The Court will give the parties an opportunity to file any supplement to their briefing on
Defendant’s motion to dismiss before ruling on the motion.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Lift Stay [36] is GRANTED
and the stay ordered on October 1, 2015 is LIFTED.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file any supplemental response to
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order;
Defendant shall have ten (10) days thereafter to file any supplemental reply in support of its
motion to dismiss.
JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 21st day of November, 2016.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?