St. Louis Heart Center, Inc. v. Nomax, Inc.

Filing 27

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney Brian J. Wanca's Motion for Additional Time to Submit Application to Practice Before this Court (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Wanca's Verified Motion for Admission Pro Hae Vice (ECF No. 20) is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 5/1/15. (JWJ)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ST. LOUIS HEART CENTER, INC. , individually ) ) and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NO MAX, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 4:15-CV-517-RLW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Court is in receipt of attorney Brian J. Wanca' s Verified Statement (ECF No. 25) that he will seek admission to practice before this Court filed pursuant to this Court' s Order of April 23, 2015 (ECF No. 21). In his Motion for Additional Time to Submit Application to Practice Before this Court (ECF No. 26), Mr. Wanca requests additional time, until June 1, 2015, to submit his application to allow sufficient time for him to secure all required certificates of good standing. He also requests the Court grant his pending motion for admission pro hac vice (ECF No. 20) to permit interim admission for purposes of this case. The Court will grant Mr. Wanca until June 1, 2015 to submit his application for admission to practice before this Court but deny his request for interim admission since there is other counsel already entered in this case on behalf of the plaintiff. According! y, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney Brian J. Wanca' s Motion for Additional Time to Submit Application to Practice Before this Court (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Wanca' s Verified Motion for Admission Pro Hae Vice (ECF No. 20) is DENIED. Dated this 1st day of May, 2015. Yi~L~ RONNIE L. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?