Chalov v. United States of America
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2255 is DENIED without prejudice. A separate Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/23/15. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
GEORGE DIMITROV CHALOV,
Movant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:15-CV-585-RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on movant=s motion to vacate, set aside, or
correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2255. Movant seeks habeas corpus relief
from the final judgment entered in United States v. Chalov, 4:13-CR-492-RWS
(E.D. Mo.). The Court notes, however, that on April 6, 2015, movant filed a
direct appeal from said judgment, and the appeal has been transmitted to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Because movant’s direct appeal is pending, his ' 2255 motion has been
prematurely filed. See Masters v. Eide, 353 F.2d 517, 518 (8th Cir.1965) (per
curiam) (resort cannot ordinarily be had to habeas corpus while an appeal from a
conviction is pending). Finding no extraordinary circumstances that would allow
movant to file his motion at this time, the Court will dismiss this action without
prejudice to refiling after the direct criminal appeal is concluded.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant=s motion to vacate, set aside, or
correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2255 is DENIED without prejudice.
A separate Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order.
Dated this 23rd day of April, 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?