Weber v. Interthinx, Inc. et al

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file his First Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall detach and docket Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Doc. No. 18-1), which was filed as an attachment to the Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Interthinx, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss 9 is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/26/15. (JWD)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN WEBER, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERTHINX, INC., and VERISK
ANALYTICS CORPORATION,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:15-CV-646-JAR

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On April 17, 2015, Plaintiff John Weber filed his Complaint and Jury Demand naming as
Defendants Interthinx, Inc. (“Interthinx”) and Verisk Analytics Corporation (“Verisk”). On May
11, 2015, Interthinx moved to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim for relief
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 9) The parties have stipulated that Weber can
submit a First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand to cure the purported pleading deficiencies.
(Doc. No. 18) The Court will therefore grant Weber leave to amend his complaint and deny
Interthinx’s motion to dismiss as moot.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted leave to file his First Amended
Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall detach and docket Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and
Jury Demand (Doc. No. 18-1), which was filed as an attachment to the Stipulation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Interthinx, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss [9] is
DENIED as moot.

JOHN A. ROSS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 26th day of May, 2015.

-2-