Suzanne Degnen, D.M.D., PC v. Megadent, Inc et al

Filing 27

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Stay [ECF No. 16 ] is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 8/31/2015. (CBL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SUZANNE DEGNEN, D.M.D., P.C. d/b/a SUNSET TOWER FAMILY DENTISTRY, Plaintiff, vs. MEGADENT, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:15CV00929 ERW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Stay [ECF No. 16]. Factors to consider in determining a stay are potential prejudice to the non-moving party, hardship and inequity to the moving party if the action is not stayed, and the judicial resources that would be saved by the stay. Emerson v. Lincoln Elec. Holdings, Inc., No. 09-6004-CV-SJGAF, 2009 WL 690181 at *1 (W.D.Mo. Mar. 12, 2009). After considering all of the factors and in light of the Eighth Circuit’s suggestion in Nack v. Walburg, 715680, 682 (8th Cir. 2013), wherein the Eighth Circuit instructed the district court it “may entertain any requests to stay proceedings for pursuit of administrative determination of the issues raised,” the Court will grant Defendants’ motion to stay this case. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Stay [ECF No. 16] is GRANTED. So Ordered this 31st day of August, 2015. E. RICHARD WEBBER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?