Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Mudd et al
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff The Prudential Insurance Company of America's Motion for Interpleader Relief is GRANTED. [Doc. 28] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that The Prudential Insurance Comp any of America is a mere stakeholder of the Death Benefit and The Prudential Insurance Company of America is hereby discharged from all liability related to the Death Benefit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Karen Define Mudd, Alex Mudd, Austin Mudd, Stacy Mudd and plaintiff The Prudential Insurance Company of America's Joint Consent Motion for Adoption of the Parties' Allocation of Policy Proceeds is GRANTED. [Doc. 34] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the balance of th e interpleaded funds shall be awarded, in equal parts and with any accrued interest, after deduction of the applicable administrative fee, to defendants Karen Define Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Kare n Define Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd shall file with the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 13.04(D)(2), a proposed order for disbursement of the Death Benefit...IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff The Prudential Insurance Company of Americ a is fully released and discharged from any and all liability to Karen Define Mudd, Stacy Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd with regard to the Group Policy and/or the Death Benefit payable thereunder, and Karen Define Mudd, Stacy Mudd, Alex Mudd, a nd Austin Mudd are hereby permanently enjoined from bringing any action or proceeding in any forum, or making any further actual or implied claims, demands and causes of action, asserted or unasserted, liquidated or unliquidated, or bringing any acti on or proceeding in any forum, arising out of or in connection with The Prudential Insurance Company of America relating to the Group Policy and/or the Death Benefit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims, rights, interests and actions that Karen Define Mudd, Stacy Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd might otherwise have held against The Prudential Insurance Company of America and its present and former parents, subsidiaries and affiliated corporations, predecessors, successors and as signs and their respective officers, directors, agents, employees, representatives, attorneys, fiduciaries and administrators, with respect to the Group Policy and/or the Death Benefit, are hereby released. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice., Terminate Case. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/19/2016. (MRC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
KAREN DEFINE MUDD, STACY MUDD,
ALEX MUDD, and AUSTIN MUDD,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:15-CV-1024 CAS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Consent Motion for Adoption of the
Parties’ Allocation of Policy Proceeds. Also before the Court is plaintiff The Prudential Insurance
Company of America’s (“Prudential”) Motion for Interpleader Relief.
The above-captioned case is an interpleader action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335. On
June 30, 2015, Prudential filed this interpleader action asking the Court to determine which of the
defendants are entitled to receive certain life insurance proceeds in the amount of $300,000, plus
accrued claim interest, due as a consequence of the death of Michael J. Mudd (the “Insured”), under
a group life insurance bearing policy number GO-14273 issued by Prudential to The American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants Insurance Trust (the “Group Policy”). Named as
defendants are Karen Define Mudd, Stacy Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd. Service was
achieved on all defendants, and answers were timely filed by all defendants.
On December 17, 2015, Defendant Karen Mudd filed a Crossclaim for a Declaratory
Judgment against Stacy Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd asking the Court to determine which
of the defendants are entitled to receive the life insurance proceeds at issue.
On January 4, 2016, Prudential deposited $301,564.85 (the “Death Benefit”), consisting of
the total death benefit amount payable under the Group Policy as a result of the Insured’s death, plus
all applicable claim interest, into the registry of the Court.
On January 14, 2016, Prudential filed a motion for interpleader relief. Prudential asserts in
its motion that by having deposited the Death Benefit into the Court’s registry, it has satisfied the
requirements of statutory interpleader and, therefore, it is appropriate to discharge Prudential from
any and all liability to the defendants with regard to the Group Policy or Death Benefit. Prudential
also asserts in its motion that it reserves the right to file a motion for the reimbursement of costs and
reasonable attorneys’ fees, but states that “[i]n the event this matter proceeds unopposed, Prudential
does not intend to file an application for reimbursement of its attorneys’ fees.” (Doc. 28 at 9. n.2.)
On March 14, 2016, Karen Define Mudd, Alex Mudd, Austin Mudd, Stacy Mudd, and
Prudential filed a Joint Consent Motion for Adoption of the Parties’ Allocation of Policy Proceeds
asking this Court to order the Clerk of Court to disburse the Death Benefit in accordance with their
proposed order, which would fully resolve all pending matters in the lawsuit.
On March 14, 2016, as part of the Joint Consent Motion for Adoption of the Parties’
Allocation of Policy Proceeds, Stacy Mudd forfeited, waived, released, and forever relinquished her
right to the Death Benefit, in whole or part.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff The Prudential Insurance Company of America’s
Motion for Interpleader Relief is GRANTED. [Doc. 28]
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that The Prudential Insurance Company of America is a mere
stakeholder of the Death Benefit and The Prudential Insurance Company of America is hereby
discharged from all liability related to the Death Benefit.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Karen Define Mudd, Alex Mudd, Austin
Mudd, Stacy Mudd and plaintiff The Prudential Insurance Company of America’s Joint Consent
Motion for Adoption of the Parties’Allocation of Policy Proceeds is GRANTED. [Doc. 34]
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the balance of the interpleaded funds shall be awarded,
in equal parts and with any accrued interest, after deduction of the applicable administrative fee, to
defendants Karen Define Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Karen Define Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin
Mudd shall file with the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 13.04(D)(2), a proposed order for
disbursement of the Death Benefit. The proposed order shall comply with Rule 13.04(D)(2) and
must contain (a) the principal sum initially deposited; (b) the amount or amounts of principal to be
disbursed; (c) the percentage of accrued interest payable with each principal amount, after the Clerk
deducts from the total accrued interest the applicable administrative fee pursuant to the General
Order of January 10, 1991; (d) to whom exactly each disbursement check should be made payable;
(e) full mailing instructions for each disbursement check, including full street address and zip code;
and (f) the social security number or tax ID number of each recipient of accrued interest, and known
attorney fees, which must be provided to the Finance Department of the Clerk’s Office on a
completed and signed I.R.S. Form W-9. A copy of I.R.S. Form W-9 is available on the Court’s
website.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff The Prudential Insurance Company of America
is fully released and discharged from any and all liability to Karen Define Mudd, Stacy Mudd, Alex
Mudd, and Austin Mudd with regard to the Group Policy and/or the Death Benefit payable
thereunder, and Karen Define Mudd, Stacy Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd are hereby
permanently enjoined from bringing any action or proceeding in any forum, or making any further
actual or implied claims, demands and causes of action, asserted or unasserted, liquidated or
unliquidated, or bringing any action or proceeding in any forum, arising out of or in connection with
The Prudential Insurance Company of America relating to the Group Policy and/or the Death
Benefit.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims, rights, interests and actions that Karen Define
Mudd, Stacy Mudd, Alex Mudd, and Austin Mudd might otherwise have held against The Prudential
Insurance Company of America and its present and former parents, subsidiaries and affiliated
corporations, predecessors, successors and assigns and their respective officers, directors, agents,
employees, representatives, attorneys, fiduciaries and administrators, with respect to the Group
Policy and/or the Death Benefit, are hereby released.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 19th day of April, 2016.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?