Young et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND. This motion comes before the court on Plaintiffs' motion to remand. [ECF No. 28 ] Persuaded by the well-reasoned and thorough order of the Honorable Catherine E. Perry in Farrar v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., 4: 15-cv-01219, this Court agrees Plaintiffs' motion to remand in this case should be and will be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for remand [ECF No. 28 ] is granted, and this case is remanded to the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied without prejudice to being refiled in state court. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 10/16/2015. (Order and Certified docket sheet mailed to St. Louis City Circuit Court this date.)(CBL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
TRACY YVETTE YOUNG, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON &
JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, and
IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC., F/K/A
LUZENACK AMERICA INC.

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:15CV01222 ERW

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND
This motion comes before the court on Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. [ECF No. 28]
Persuaded by the well-reasoned and thorough order of the Honorable Catherine E. Perry in
Farrar v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., 4:15-cv-01219, this Court agrees Plaintiffs’ motion to
remand in this case should be and will be granted.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for remand [ECF No. 28] is granted,
and this case is remanded to the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied without prejudice to
being refiled in state court.
Dated this 16th Day of October, 2015.

E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE