Hodges v. United States of America

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint [ECF No. 6 ] is DENIED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to expedite [ECF No. 7 ] is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on September 29, 2015. (BRP)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SUMAYAH HODGES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:15CV1339 RLW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff has filed a post-dismissal motion for leave to file an amended complaint. 1 She alleges that the United States, the FBI, federal judges, the former Attorney General, the Secretary of Defense, and other government officials are attacking her "through a high energy device that is lethal and can kill, and disable a human being." Plaintiff claims that this conspiracy is responsible for a great many things, including car troubles, her depression, physical distress, the death of her father, and other severe difficulties. The Court dismissed plaintiffs complaint under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e) on the basis that it was delusional under Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25 (1992). Unfortunately, the problems that plaintiff are dealing with are products of her own imagination and do not give rise to relief in federal court. As a result, plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint is denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint [ECF No. 6] is DENIED with prejudice. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The Court construes it as a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to expedite [ECF No. 7] is DENIED as moot. Dated thi~ay of September, 2015. ~,,t.~ RONNIE L. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?