Suber v. Lemons et al

Filing 42

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED 40 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a prisoner civil rights complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file a renewed motion for leave to amend and proposed amended complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 4/20/2017). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff does not timely file a proposed amended complaint, the Court will take up defendants motion to dismiss. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 4/6/17. (CAR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CAROLS SUBER, Plaintiff, v. FREDRICK LEMONS, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:15-CV-1363 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before me on plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The motion is denied because the Court’s Local Rules require pro se parties to use the Court’s forms. See E.D. Mo. Local Rule 2.06(A). The Court will order the Clerk to send plaintiff the proper form. If plaintiff wishes to move for leave to file an amended complaint, he must file a new motion and use the Court’s form. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED. (Doc. 40) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a prisoner civil rights complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file a renewed motion for leave to amend and proposed amended complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff does not timely file a proposed amended complaint, the Court will take up defendants’ motion to dismiss. Dated this 6th day of April, 2017. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?