Hackethal v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for a Protective Order is GRANTED, in part, [ECF No. 23] and the parties shall proceed with 30(b)(6) depositions of corporate representatives. Topics will include, conc erning, among other things, corporate structure and chain of command of the QA and PAC-Man departments. The Court does not foreclose Plaintiffs ability to take more depositions, but will withhold consideration of any arguments Plaintiff wishes to make for further discovery until after these initial depositions are completed in October. The Court shall issue an amended case management order after these depositions are completed upon request of the parties. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on August 23, 2016. (MCB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION LARRY HACKETHAL, Plaintiff, v. HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:15CV01398 ERW MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.’s Motion for Protective Order. [ECF No. 23]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for a Protective Order is GRANTED, in part, [ECF No. 23] and the parties shall proceed with 30(b)(6) depositions of corporate representatives. Topics will include, concerning, among other things, corporate structure and chain of command of the “QA” and “PAC-Man” departments. The Court does not foreclose Plaintiff’s ability to take more depositions, but will withhold consideration of any arguments Plaintiff wishes to make for further discovery until after these initial depositions are completed in October. The Court shall issue an amended case management order after these depositions are completed upon request of the parties. Dated this 23rd day of August, 2016. E. RICHARD WEBBER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?