Green et al v. City of St. Louis Missouri

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendants having conceded that the exhaustion requirement was satisfied, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 11 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri, is DENIED, as defendants have not demonstrated that plaintiffs' complaint is so vague or ambiguous that they cannot reasonably prepare a response. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/5/15. (CAR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
PERCY GREEN, III, et al.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS,
Defendant.

Case No. 4:15 CV 1433 RWS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Defendants having conceded that the exhaustion requirement was satisfied,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss [9] is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for more definite statement [11] is
denied, as defendants have not demonstrated that plaintiffs’ complaint is so vague or ambiguous
that they cannot reasonably prepare a response.

RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 5th day of November, 2015.