Kerns v. Colvin
Filing
26
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 25 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying plain tiff's application for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381, et seq., is AFFIRMED. An appropriate judgment will accompany this order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 8/12/16. (JWD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
MEGAN MICHELLE KERNS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 4:15-CV-1483 CAS
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen, filed July 27, 2016. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The
Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff’s
application for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. §§ 1381, et seq., be affirmed. Neither party has filed an objection to the recommendation
and the time to do so has passed.
After careful review of the matter, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned Report and
Recommendation.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 25]
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff’s
application for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. §§ 1381, et seq., is AFFIRMED.
An appropriate judgment will accompany this order.
__________________________________
CHARLES A. SHAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 12th day of August, 2016.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?