Seko v. Colvin

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated January 19, 2017 20 is adopted in its entirety. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 2/7/17. (CAR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JOHN JUDE SEKO, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. 4:15CV1669 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah for a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b). On January 19, 2017, Judge Mensah filed her recommendation that the decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff=s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act be affirmed. No objections to Judge Mensah’s Report and Recommendation were filed, and the time for filing objections or for seeking an extension of time to do so has expired. 1 Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 1 After careful consideration, the Court will adopt and sustain the thorough reasoning of Magistrate Judge Mensah set forth in the Report and Recommendation of January 19, 2017. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated January 19, 2017 [20] is adopted in its entirety. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 7th day of February, 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?