Radford et al v. United States et al

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' "motion to order agent authorized by appointment or by law and correction" is denied. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/15/16. (ARL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RICKY WARREN RADFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) vs. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants. ) ) Case No. 4:15 CV 1720 RWS ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs’ latest motion seeks relief the Court cannot provide and is largely incomprehensible, so it is denied. Plaintiffs are really seeking legal advice from this Court about how to properly effectuate service – this, the Court cannot do. Plaintiffs chose to file this lawsuit on their own behalf, and it is their responsibility to ensure proper service of process. Moreover, I also note that plaintiffs are improperly attempting to force defendants to participate in discovery conferences before this case has even been set for a Rule 16 conference. Finally, to the extent the instant motion seeks to shorten defendants’ response time to the amended complaint, it is denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ “motion to order agent authorized by appointment or by law and correction” is denied. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 15th day of January, 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?