Radford et al v. United States et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' "motion to order agent authorized by appointment or by law and correction" is denied. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/15/16. (ARL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
RICKY WARREN RADFORD, et al.,
UNITED STATES, et al.,
Case No. 4:15 CV 1720 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiffs’ latest motion seeks relief the Court cannot provide and is largely
incomprehensible, so it is denied. Plaintiffs are really seeking legal advice from this Court about
how to properly effectuate service – this, the Court cannot do. Plaintiffs chose to file this lawsuit
on their own behalf, and it is their responsibility to ensure proper service of process. Moreover,
I also note that plaintiffs are improperly attempting to force defendants to participate in
discovery conferences before this case has even been set for a Rule 16 conference. Finally, to
the extent the instant motion seeks to shorten defendants’ response time to the amended
complaint, it is denied.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ “motion to order agent authorized by
appointment or by law and correction” is denied.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 15th
day of January, 2016.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?