Radford et al v. United States et al

Filing 23

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs objection and clarification 22 is denied. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/22/16. (ARL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RICKY WARREN RADFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:15 CV 1720 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs’ “objection and clarification” has not been served on defendants. I directed the Clerk of the Court to accept this document and file it, but any future motions must contain a certificate of service in compliance with the governing Local and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or they will not be accepted by the Clerk of the Court for filing and will be returned to plaintiffs. To the extent this documents seeks relief, it is denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ “objection and clarification” [22] is denied. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 22nd day of January, 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?