Radford et al v. United States et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel 2 is denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the "motion to provide a choice-card" 3 is denied.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/25/15. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
RICKY WARREN RADFORD, et al.,
UNITED STATES, et al.,
Case No. 4:15 CV 1720 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on plaintiffs’ motion for appointment of counsel. I am denying
appointment of counsel without prejudice, as I do not believe appointment of counsel is
warranted at this time under the relevant factors. See Battle v. Armontrout, 902 F.2d 701, 702
(8th Cir. 1990) (factors relevant to appointment of counsel include whether plaintiff has
presented non-frivolous allegations, whether there is a need for investigation, and whether factual
and legal issues are complex). I am also denying the “motion to provide a choice-card” as it
presents no legal or factual basis for relief.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel  is denied
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the “motion to provide a choice-card”  is denied.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 25th day of November, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?