Horowitz v. SunEdison, Inc. et al

Filing 92

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Given the motion currently pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation for the establishment of a multidistrict litigation case in the Southern District of New York 88 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to transfer 89 is denied without prejudice to being refiled if the motion for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings is denied by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/17/16. (CAR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
DINA HOROWITZ, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SUNEDISON, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

DARCY CHURCH, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
AHMAD CHATILA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:15 CV 1769 RWS

Case No. 4:16 CV 628 CEJ

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Given the motion currently pending before the Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation for the establishment of a multidistrict litigation case in the
Southern District of New York [88],
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to transfer [89] is denied
without prejudice to being refiled if the motion for coordinated or consolidated

pretrial proceedings is denied by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.

_______________________________
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated this 17th day of August, 2016.

2