Mitchell v. St. Louis County Police Department et al

Filing 24

ORDER - The Court ordered plaintiff to submit an address where defendant S. Pujit can be served with process no later than April 27, 2016. Plaintiff has not done so. Additionally, the ninety-day period for service of process expired on April 11, 2016. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). As a result, defendant S. Pujit is dismissed from this action without prejudice. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 5/18/2016. (MRC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KRISTINA MARIE MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:16-CV-38 CAS ORDER The Court ordered plaintiff to submit an address where defendant S. Pujit can be served with process no later than April 27, 2016. Plaintiff has not done so. Additionally, the ninety-day period for service of process expired on April 11, 2016. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). As a result, defendant S. Pujit is dismissed from this action without prejudice. An Order of Partial Dismissal will be filed separately. CHARLES A. SHAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 18th day of May, 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?