Elkins v. USA

Filing 33

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Movant filed a Motion to Dismiss Counts I and XIII of the Indictment in this closed § 2255 case while movant's motion for certificate of appealability was on appeal. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the cert ificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal on September 18, 2018. The Eighth Circuit denied the petition for rehearing en banc and the petition for rehearing by the panel on November 20, 2018. Movant's motion to dismiss does not state an y grounds for relief in this closed case and will be denied. As this case is closed, movant's motion for appointment of counsel will also be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to dismiss 28 and motion for appointment of counsel 32 -2 are denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/28/2018. (CBL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JERRY ELKINS, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:16 CV 645 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Movant filed a “Motion to Dismiss Counts I and XIII of the Indictment” in this closed § 2255 case while movant’s motion for certificate of appealability was on appeal. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal on September 18, 2018. The Eighth Circuit denied the petition for rehearing en banc and the petition for rehearing by the panel on November 20, 2018. Movant’s motion to dismiss does not state any grounds for relief in this closed case and will be denied. As this case is closed, movant’s motion for appointment of counsel will also be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant’s motion to dismiss [28] and motion for appointment of counsel [32-2] are denied. CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 28th day of November, 2018.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?